Currys, the UK’s largest electrical retailer, has introduced 6 weeks’ paid gender reassignment leave for its employees. This is in addition to their usual annual leave entitlement. The leave can be used flexibly, to cover time off for medical appointments, surgery, or recovery.
The move was announced by Currys CEO Alex Baldock in a blog post on the company’s website. He said that the company wanted to “create a more inclusive and supportive workplace for all of our colleagues.”
“We know that gender reassignment can be a complex and challenging process,” Baldock wrote. “We want to make sure that our colleagues have the time and support they need to go through this process in the best possible way.”
The introduction of gender reassignment leave is a positive step for Currys and for the wider workplace. It sends a clear message that the company is committed to creating an inclusive and supportive environment for all of its employees.
Here are some of the benefits of gender reassignment leave:
If you’re thinking of introducing a similar policy, we can advise on everything from drafting the policy to training staff, give us a call on 0161 603 2156 to see how we can help your business flourish.
The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (REULRR Bill) could affect a wide range of employment law, including:
It is important to note that the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill is still at the draft stage and it is not yet clear which parts of employment law will be affected. However, the Bill has the potential to make significant changes to employment law in the UK.
The House of Lords and House of Commons are currently considering amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (REULRR Bill). The Bill, which was introduced by the government in January 2023, aims to simplify and reform the UK’s retained EU law.
The Lords have made a number of amendments to the Bill, including:
The Commons is now considering the Lords’ amendments. It is possible that the Commons will agree to some of the amendments, disagree with others, or make its own amendments. It is also possible that the Commons will reject the Bill altogether.
The outcome of the debate in the Commons is uncertain. However, the amendments made by the Lords have highlighted the importance of ensuring that the UK’s retained EU law is clear, accessible, and compatible with the UK’s human rights obligations.
Here are some of the key points of the amendments made by the Lords:
The debate in the Commons about the amendments made by the Lords is likely to be closely watched by businesses, individuals, and organizations that have an interest in the UK’s retained EU law. The outcome of the debate could have a significant impact on how retained EU law is implemented in the UK.
Keep an eye on our socials and news posts to keep up to date with relevant legislation changes, and if you need any assistance with HR or Health & Safety for your business, contact our friendly team today on 0161 603 2156 or at [email protected] and see how we can help your business flourish!
In the employment tribunal case of Webb v London Underground, an employee was dismissed for making a number of offensive and discriminatory posts on her personal Facebook page. The employee argued that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy over her Facebook posts, and that her dismissal was therefore unfair.
The employment tribunal disagreed, finding that the employee’s Facebook posts were “wholly unacceptable” and that she had “no reasonable expectation of privacy” in relation to them. The tribunal also found that the employee’s dismissal was fair, as it was a proportionate response to her misconduct.
This case is significant because it sets a precedent for how employment tribunals will consider the privacy of social media posts in future cases. The tribunal’s decision makes it clear that employees do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy over their social media posts, even if they are made on a personal account. This means that employers can discipline or dismiss employees for making offensive or discriminatory posts on social media, even if the posts are made outside of work hours.
The case also highlights the importance of employees being mindful of what they post on social media. Even if you think your posts are private, there is always a risk that they could be seen by your employer or colleagues. It is therefore important to think carefully about what you post, and to avoid making any posts that could be considered offensive or discriminatory.
Here are some additional details about the case:
The case of Webb v London Underground is a reminder to employees that they should be mindful of what they post on social media. Even if you think your posts are private, there is always a risk that they could be seen by your employer or colleagues. It is therefore important to think carefully about what you post, and to avoid making any posts that could be considered offensive or discriminatory.
If you need any help with any aspect of people management or Health & Safety for your business, contact our friendly team on 0161 603 2156 or at [email protected] today and we’ll discuss how we can help!
The Local Government Association has updated the Burgundy Book, a handbook outlining the conditions of service for school teachers in England and Wales:
The new edition of the Burgundy Book is a significant update that clarifies and updates the conditions of service for school teachers in England and Wales. The new edition is a welcome development, as it ensures that teachers are aware of their rights and responsibilities and that they are able to access the support they need to do their jobs effectively.
Education is one of our key sectors – whether you’re a nursery, school, college or beyond – give us a call on 0161 603 2156 or email us at [email protected] to see how we can help your Education establishment flourish!
In 2023, Ian Clifford, a former employee of IBM, won a disability discrimination case against the company. The case centered on IBM’s decision to terminate Clifford’s employment after he was diagnosed with a mental health condition.
Clifford had been employed by IBM for over 20 years when he was diagnosed with depression in 2017. He took a leave of absence from work to seek treatment, and he returned to work in 2018. However, IBM placed him on a performance improvement plan, and he was eventually terminated from his job in 2019.
Clifford filed a complaint with the Employment Tribunal, alleging that IBM had discriminated against him on the basis of his disability. The Tribunal found in Clifford’s favor, ruling that IBM had failed to make reasonable adjustments for his disability and that it had dismissed him because of his mental health condition.
The Clifford case is a significant victory for people with disabilities. It sends a clear message that employers cannot discriminate against employees on the basis of their disability. The case also highlights the importance of employers making reasonable adjustments for employees with disabilities.
What are Reasonable Adjustments?
Reasonable adjustments are changes that employers can make to their workplaces or policies to accommodate employees with disabilities. These adjustments can include things like providing accessible facilities, modifying job duties, or offering flexible working arrangements.
Employers are required to make reasonable adjustments for employees with disabilities under the Equality Act 2010. This means that employers must make changes to their workplaces or policies if they are necessary to allow employees with disabilities to do their jobs.
What are the Benefits of Making Reasonable Adjustments?
There are many benefits to making reasonable adjustments for employees with disabilities. These benefits include:
How Can Employers Make Reasonable Adjustments?
There are many ways that employers can make reasonable adjustments for employees with disabilities. Some of the most common adjustments include:
Employers should work with employees with disabilities to identify the adjustments that are necessary to allow them to do their jobs. By making reasonable adjustments, employers can create a more inclusive workplace for everyone.
Mental health is just as important as physical health, and it’s something that can affect anyone, regardless of their age, gender, or occupation. In the workplace, mental health issues can lead to decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, and even presenteeism (working while sick).
That’s why it’s so important for employers to create a culture of mental health awareness in the workplace. By raising awareness of mental health issues, employers can help employees to understand the signs and symptoms of mental health problems, and they can also provide support and resources to employees who are struggling.
There are a number of things that employers can do to raise mental health awareness in the workplace. These include:
By taking these steps, employers can help to create a workplace that is supportive of mental health. This can lead to a number of benefits for both employees and employers, including increased productivity, decreased absenteeism, and improved employee morale.
Here are some additional tips for employers on how to create a mentally healthy workplace:
By taking these steps, employers can help to create a mentally healthy workplace that is beneficial for both employees and employers.
If you'd like to find out more about how Supportis can help your business flourish then give us a call on 0161 603 2156 or send us an email.
Contact Us